<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
    <title>vsbabu.org : usability</title>
    <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/categories/usability/</link>
    <description>Gluing passing thoughts to foregone conclusions</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>vsbabu@gmail.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2008</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2003-11-21T06:50:54+05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=2.661" />
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:vsbabu@gmail.com"/>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>

    <item>
      <title>Processing e-mail attachments properly</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2003/11/21/processing_email_attachments_properly.html</link>
      <description>I still don&apos;t know which one though.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">938@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
I recently sent a big document by email. The recipient, replied
with the acknowledgement. Apparently, his email client replies with the attachment too. When I got the mail, it promptly filled up my mailbox.
</p>

<p>
I would have thought "reply" shouldn't add attachment by default. Attachment should be retained only when you forward the mail.  Outlook 2000, Opera and Mozilla Thunderbird handles this properly.
Apparently, there are not so sensible software is out there :-)
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2003-11-21T06:50:54+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Cranky User</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002/11/04/the_cranky_user.html</link>
      <description>Could you repeat that?</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">602@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
An excellent article from <a href="http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/us-cranky23.html"><cite>IBM dW</cite></a> about the problems faced in automation: <blockquote>One of the most common tasks computer users face is repetition -- performing the same task more than once. Computers are fairly good at this. So why do people spend so much time repeating tasks by hand? Often the interfaces they use are resistant to automation, and other interfaces are obscure or unavailable.</blockquote>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2002-11-04T06:17:52+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Building accessible tables</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002/10/02/building_accessible_tables.html</link>
      <description>Create accessible tables in HTML</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">550@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://www.evolt.org/article/Building_accessible_tables/4090/42090/index.html">Evolt.org</a> - <q>

CSS and XHTML have given tables a pretty rough ride in recent times. Of course, this is the fault of just about all web developers who have at some point in their career used them for laying out page elements. This article is not about using tables for layout. It is about how to use tables to display information in an accessible manner. Use XHTML and CSS all you want for layout, but at the end of the day (if there is one on the internet) so long as there are informational relationships there will be tables. In fact, to attempt to display any of complex information relationships without a table is a mistake. If you have information to display, use tables and use them well. </q>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2002-10-02T08:42:38+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Inaccessible accessibility</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002/09/04/inaccessible_accessibility.html</link>
      <description>Molly looks back at achieving accessibility.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">470@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://www.molly.com/ppt-accessibility.php">
fun stuff: inaccessible accessibility</a> - <q>Recently, I posted an inaccessible accessibility presentation here on my web site. The irony was not lost on me the day I did it and in fact I posted why I was doing it right here in this spot.</q> - <cite>Molly Holzschlag</cite>.
</p>

<p>Molly has interesting links to make PowerPoint presentations accessible, with some limitations. But what I really liked is the way she explains her thoughts. Nothing religious about it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2002-09-04T12:40:00+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Day 10 gets me stumped!</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002/06/21/day_10_gets_me_stumped.html</link>
      <description>As everyone knows by now, Mark Pilgrim has been posting his accessibility guidelines and even code fragments on how to...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">396@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As everyone knows by now, Mark Pilgrim has been posting his <a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/rooms/30_days_to_a_more_accessible_weblog/index.html">accessibility guidelines</a> and even code fragments on how to make life easier for everyone.</p>

<p>I've been making these changes to my templates every day - some of them where already done. Now, <a href="http://diveintomark.org/archives/2002/06/21.html#day_10_presenting_your_main_content_first">presenting the main content first</a> is a tough one for me. I need to move the navigation bar from top to bottom, then fix all the style sheets and then rebuild. I should've moved to a SSI based template. I'm defering this for the future.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2002-06-21T06:10:39+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using web widgets wisely</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002/06/21/using_web_widgets_wisely.html</link>
      <description>Usability specialist Jodi Bollaert discusses Web widgets, and when it&apos;s appropriate (or not) to use them.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">395@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IBM dW: Usability specialist Jodi Bollaert <a href="http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/usability/library/us-widget/?loc=dwmain">discusses Web widgets</a>, and when it's appropriate (or not) to use them.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2002-06-21T05:48:30+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Don&apos;t set automatic focus!</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002/06/07/dont_set_automatic_focus.html</link>
      <description>Setting auto focus on a text box can frustrate users using page-up/dn keys.</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">370@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several sites try to enhance their sites usability by writing a simple Javascript to automatically focus on to the first form field. Typically, lot of sites have the first field as the "Search" box. For long scrolling pages (<a href="http://www.metagroup.com/">example</a>), such focussing is more annoying than helpful. Since the focus gets into the form field, whatever you do with "Page-UP" or "Page-DOWN" buttons and arrow keys have no effect.</p>

<p>If your page is specifically for a web form, then this kind of automatic focussing makes sense. Even then, if your first field is a select list don't put auto-focus on it. People might try to scroll down, but what will happen is that some thing else in the select list will get selected, without user noticing it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2002-06-07T12:19:38+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ladies and pop up windows</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002/05/26/ladies_and_pop_up_windows.html</link>
      <description>Does lady web designers prefer links to open up in new windows?</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">344@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the weekend, I've been browsing several web logs, mainly from <a href="http://www.movabletype.org/">MovableType.org</a>. A significant percentage of lady bloggers whose sites I visited, prefer their external links to open up in a new window. Here's a sampler.<br />
- <a href="http://www.scriptygoddess.com/">Scripty Goddess</a>: Including <a href="http://www.theworkingmom.net">the working mom</a>, Kristine at <a href="http://www.love-productions.com/hopelessromantics/">hopeless romantics</a>, Lynda at <a href="http://posh.digitalwoe.com/">so very posh</a>.<br />
- Robin at <a href="http://www.blogblogbaby.com/">Ain't too proud to blog</a>.</p>

<p><br />
I found three who don't open up links in new windows<br />
- Dawn at <a href="http://a.lifeuncommon.org/">Life Uncommon</a><br />
- Christine at <a href="http://www.blahblahblog.com/">Blah Blah Blog</a><br />
- Laurie Mueller a.k.a <a href="http://www.minnesotagardener.com/">Minnesota Gardener</a></p>

<p>All these sites are very well designed. None of them leaves any doubt as to why ladies make the best visual design.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2002-05-26T10:53:28+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Web UI: The sanctity of elements</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002/05/05/web_ui_the_sanctity_of_elements.html</link>
      <description>Meg Hourihan on how developers need to put their foot down on making usable interfaces, without succumbing to the whims...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">313@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/javascript/2002/05/03/megnut.html">Meg Hourihan</a> on how developers need to put their foot down on making usable interfaces, without succumbing to the whims and fancies of the clients. </p>

<p>I totally agree with all her points.</p>

<p>Personally, I'd like to add to  this one - "Don't Respond Immediately". Responding immediately can really cause your client going back and forth on brilliant ideas and you going back and forth to your version control tool. Additionally, if you work in a team where others are not enthusiastic about getting things done quickly, that can result in a very unrewarding workplace experience.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2002-05-05T18:14:53+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DeBono&apos;s simplicity principles</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002/03/23/debonos_simplicity_principles.html</link>
      <description>Ten commandments for achieving simplicity. I agree with him completely. But I can&apos;t figure out why he made the site...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">215@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lifewithus.com/lwu/simplicity/0.htm">Ten commandments</a> for achieving simplicity. I agree with him completely. But I can't figure out why he made the site so complicated :-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2002-03-23T11:57:47+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Some more usability resources</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002/03/20/some_more_usability_resources.html</link>
      <description>Chanced upon Web Word and Microsoft&apos;s Inductive User Interface guidelines....</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">205@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chanced upon <a href="http://www.webword.com/">Web Word</a> and Microsoft's <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwindev/html/iuiguidelines.asp" title="MSDN site, probably only works with IE">Inductive User Interface guidelines</a>.<br />
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2002-03-20T07:34:21+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dumb web users!</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002/03/07/dumb_web_users.html</link>
      <description>Quote from a discussion group: &quot;users (read: catatonic spineless imbeciles who whine like they get paid for it)&quot;. Sadly, very...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">169@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote from a discussion group: <em>"users (read: catatonic spineless imbeciles who whine like they get paid for it)"</em>.</p>

<p>Sadly, very much true when it comes to developing web applications. Not a single soul to give ideas on how the interface should look  <u>before</u> you make it, but every one with lot of whining on how what you made doesn't fit with their mental picture of it and tons of "creative" ideas soon <u>after</u>. It is only with the web really - I've made Oracle applications with Oracle Forms and people were pretty happy always and straight away use it. The moment it is on the web, they want to put spinning cell phones here, purple and gold color there... </p>

<p>Another consistent source of annoyance is the group that does only "thinking" - motto, "we think, you do".  They usually have architect or analyst or expert tagged somewhere in their title. Skills in implementation or estimating implementation is usually limited to "oh, we spent 4 months to make this 200 page Word document and a 20 slide Power Point presentation (with animations!). Since the whole project is for 4 months, you now can go ahead and do the implementation in 1 or 2 days. By the way, we'll have some changes tomorrow too".  The saddest part is that quite a few managers don't understand that the final requirement is a system, not documents and presentations. Perhaps that is why we live in a world of vaporware and tupperware software.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2002-03-07T07:12:21+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Webtrendslive fixes the login page!</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002/03/02/webtrendslive_fixes_the_login_page.html</link>
      <description>Ah, this morning I logged in to Webtrends Live. I saw that they&apos;ve fixed the usability issue on their login...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">150@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, this morning I logged in to <a href="http://www.webtrendslive.com/">Webtrends Live</a>. I saw that they've fixed <a href="http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002_02_27.html#000137">the usability issue on their login page</a>. Thank you!</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2002-03-02T08:19:53+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Login page annoyances</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002/02/27/login_page_annoyances.html</link>
      <description>It is useful to automatically set focus to form fields - saves the visitor one click. However, it can really...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">137@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="yahoo login" src="http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/images/yahoo_login.gif" width="224" height="100" border="1" align="right" hspace="2" vspace="2" />It is useful to automatically set focus to form fields - saves the visitor one click. However, it can really go sore if your page doesn't load quickly. The login page of <a href="http://mail.yahoo.com">Yahoo! mail</a> suffers from this focussing happening too slow over a T1 line. Usually, the page loads, I go and add in my user name and while I'm halfway entering my password, the focusing kicks in without me noticing it. Effect is that half of my password is in the user name field - when working from office or cyber cafe, others can see it too.</p>

<p><img alt="wtl login" src="http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/images/wtl_login.gif" width="233" height="71" border="1" hspace="2" vspace="2" align="right" /><a href="http://www.webtrendslive.com/">Webtrends Live</a> has a login page that suffers from a tab order issue. It is <em>username - Go button - password</em> instead of <em>username - password - Go button</em>. I wrote to them, but they claim it must be browser bugs. I use Opera and Mozilla, on Windows on Linux. I suppose it must work with IE. The source code of the page seems to indicate that the tab order is set correctly.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2002-02-27T07:04:20+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why I hate Popup windows</title>
      <link>http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/2002/02/26/why_i_hate_popup_windows.html</link>
      <description> Aaarghhh. I&apos;ve had it with people putting content in popup windows. Guys, however well you designed your window -...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">132@http://vsbabu.org/mt/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.tintin.com/"><img alt="Captain Haddock said it!" src="http://vsbabu.org/mt/archives/images/haddock.jpg" width="165" height="168" border="1"  hspace="2" vspace="2" align="right"/></a> Aaarghhh. I've had it with people putting content in popup windows. Guys, however well you designed your window - using flash, animated GIFs, colorful scrollbars with IE - if your content is in popup, it sucks. And it does not keep the visitor on your site.</p>

<p>Here's why:</p>

<p>- Perhaps you are not aware of it, but there are people with smaller monitors and large resolution. Your carefully designed window with fixed fonts etc goes for a toss in these environments. You are positively evil if you turn off scrollbars in your pages too.<br />
- My version of IE 5.5 at home is what I got from AT&T. It has a bug in that any popup window's content will time out. I need to stop it, then hit refresh in the window to see it. Thanks to you, menu bar is hidden in the popup, so I need to hit CTRL-R to refresh. No thank you, I'll hit close button instead.<br />
- Most of the time I use Opera or Mozilla, in Linux. Both these browsers support tabbed windows interface and I love it. Browsing your site is not the only thing I'm doing all the time. I've other applications open. When your window pops up, it adds that much clutter to my task bar. If I want to open in a new window, I'll right click and do so.<br />
- Most of the time, I simply close a popped up window or a link opening in a new window before it even fills up with content. I've observed this among other users too.<br />
- Oh, my proxy server also kills these things considering them to be advertisements.</p>

<p>Still not convinced? Read <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990530.html">top 10 mistakes of web design</a> and grow up. A site you make is for others to see and not for you to salivate over.</p>

<p><em>"Just because you know Javascript doesn't mean that you need to put it everywhere you can. Good design is not in deciding what to use, but most of the time what not to use."</em></p>

<p>Then go and educate your marketing bosses or graphic artists about the fact that web is a new medium. Ask them how would they like it if while reading a magazine a page just jumped right at their face again and again.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2002-02-26T19:33:37+05:00</dc:date>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>

